Starship | SN10 | High-Altitude Flight Test

3 Mar 2021
8 444 647 Visualizações

On Wednesday, March 3, Starship serial number (SN10) successfully completed SpaceX’s third high-altitude flight test of a Starship prototype from our site in Cameron County, Texas.
Similar to the high-altitude flight tests of Starship SN8 and SN9, SN10 was powered through ascent by three Raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee - approximately 10 km in altitude. SN10 performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent.

The Starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. All four flaps were actuated by an onboard flight computer to control Starship’s attitude during flight and enabled a precise landing at the intended location. SN10’s Raptor engines reignited as the vehicle performed the landing flip maneuver immediately before successfully touching down on the landing pad!
As if the flight test was not exciting enough, SN10 experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly shortly after landing. These test flights are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long-duration interplanetary flights, and help humanity return to the Moon, and travel to Mars and beyond.

Comentários
  • 5:25

    dueidjdueidj8 horas atrás
  • Unbelievable

    David HammondDavid Hammond14 horas atrás
  • Those rockets are a waste of time and money they're dangerous because you have to carry that fuel for landing which also makes it not economical it's a waste of time and money

    steveissexy 1967.steveissexy 1967.Dia atrás
    • lol

      TuuminshzTuuminshz15 horas atrás
  • I love this

    Guillermo RivasGuillermo RivasDia atrás
  • Заебись мультфильм...

    Серж ВладимирскийСерж ВладимирскийDia atrás
  • beautiful CGI

    Live TuberLive TuberDia atrás
  • spaceX

    Brien DunphyBrien DunphyDia atrás
  • wach sorry

    Brien DunphyBrien DunphyDia atrás
  • Flying Squid

    iql dnriql dnrDia atrás
  • I think Elon musk did the the biggest bottle flip in juman history

    Alexander PerdomoAlexander PerdomoDia atrás
    • Human history

      Alexander PerdomoAlexander PerdomoDia atrás
  • brworld.info/crone/video/qqmXk7GaotqndJI.html

    Buğra Çağrı YURTBuğra Çağrı YURT2 dias atrás
  • announcer sounds like a dude from the early 1950's

    lifefunseeker todaylifefunseeker today2 dias atrás
  • " If it doesn't look like a duck, swim like a duck, and quack like a duck, then it probably isn't a duck "

    [[[] S c o t b o X []]][[[] S c o t b o X []]]2 dias atrás
  • oyes desde el segundo 40 al 30 dice hay falla en el sistema

    Jimmy B. Perez LopezJimmy B. Perez Lopez2 dias atrás
  • The dislikes are from aliens

    rbxlessrbxless3 dias atrás
  • Focusnici blin

    Андрей КаАндрей Ка3 dias atrás
  • Me: shows off my laggy big thicc redstone rocket in random Minecraft creative worlds What I see 5:43

    LeEpicPlayz BaconLeEpicPlayz Bacon3 dias atrás
  • So finally that attack is rebugged for enslavement of attackers pilots and defense missiles to aoid future outfalls...

    Elias OhmElias Ohm4 dias atrás
  • 1:11 sn9 moment 1:31 sn8 moment

    LoparceGaming826LoparceGaming8264 dias atrás
  • gg

    PrimeIXPrimeIX4 dias atrás
  • 👍👽

    Виталий ЛукашинВиталий Лукашин4 dias atrás
  • It's so. incredibly. loud. WOw!

    emmmemmm4 dias atrás
  • Amazing job!

    Heybar SequeraHeybar Sequera4 dias atrás
  • Was that real footage or CGI interspersed with real footage?

    stringsnarestringsnare5 dias atrás
    • Real footage, all the way through. It was a livestream.

      alexn310alexn3104 dias atrás
  • 11:42 The best most unbelievable non CGI part of the video. Truly amazing shot

    HOW DO YOU VENT LIKE BLUE?HOW DO YOU VENT LIKE BLUE?6 dias atrás
  • MUY BUENO- UN ABRAZO Y UN BESO GORDO- El video mio se encuentra en el YOU TUBE y se llama- robotizado con cd 4017 , ne 555 pilotos El plano esta bajo el video. Andre Troll Kaiser

    andre trollandre troll7 dias atrás
  • Wow! I thankyou but i think the landing was far more astounding than the take off. Fantastic👍👍👍

    Frank TuckwellFrank Tuckwell7 dias atrás
  • 11:41 Looks like one of those movie scenes.

    Glitched BloxGlitched Blox7 dias atrás
  • Huge Respect for the Engineers, technicians and every worker at SpaceX 🙏💯.

    bcvbb hyuibcvbb hyui7 dias atrás
  • Es una nave de Flash Gordon, OMG!

    moises gonzalesmoises gonzales7 dias atrás
  • Cortaram a parte da explosão pq? HUAUHAUHHAUUH medo de cair ações elon musk?

    Caio PortellaCaio Portella7 dias atrás
  • amazing..

    onemaxlightonemaxlight8 dias atrás
  • For a moment, it looked CGI.

    ICOD73ICOD738 dias atrás
    • I watched this with my own eyes. 100% not CGI.

      Alex HendrixAlex Hendrix6 dias atrás
    • Nice

      bcvbb hyuibcvbb hyui7 dias atrás
  • The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

    Ailsa NiAilsa Ni8 dias atrás
  • Man will go mars no earlier than 2040. Even a small cybertruck takes years to be released to public, I can't imagine how long it will take starship to meet all the requirements. Probably decades. The news says we will see Man on mars very soon, just to keep us high expectations, but I think it's just marketing. I'm just being realistic.

    Igor Delta F.Igor Delta F.8 dias atrás
    • I wrote the wrong number of days. It's +400 to 500 days. Yet not for this decade. It's just my opinion, I hope I'm wrong. Thank you Matt for remind me to correct the days. Mr. Lmao, sorry to challenge your beliefs, if you don't agree write why you don't, instead of going straight to offensive words.

      Igor Delta F.Igor Delta F.2 dias atrás
    • @Lmao. My bad, I'll delete my response

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff2 dias atrás
    • @Matt's BRworld stuff i was referring to the original comment

      Lmao.Lmao.2 dias atrás
    • so is this "argument" just some copy paste shit or are you part of a hivemind? i've seen this exact comment several times now.

      Lmao.Lmao.2 dias atrás
    • @Igor Delta F. I'm not sure where you get 1400 days from. During the closest approach, Mars is about a 6-9 month journey depending on which year you launch. That is maximum ~270 days trip one way to Mars. Perhaps you can be more specific on where you are getting your numbers from

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff4 dias atrás
  • So Elon is iron man because that seems a lot like how iron man lands 😄👀

    little Phoenix33little Phoenix338 dias atrás
  • happen live 😂

    vbddfy euuytvbddfy euuyt9 dias atrás
    • @Ailsa Ni what

      Cleanrial & Tronnzy - RobloxCleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox7 dias atrás
    • Демократия не долетит до Марса.

      Ailsa NiAilsa Ni8 dias atrás
  • did anyone else notice the hard bounce on landing or the drone view that looked like a cheap netflix movie?

    Wayne DavisWayne Davis9 dias atrás
  • hi mates is very enjoy...blazz_zzzz

    Olavo NevesOlavo Neves9 dias atrás
  • congratulations

    SadSmileTVSadSmileTV10 dias atrás
  • What a bunch a shit! Can't believe y'all into this crap, CGI at the end got me cracking, no craft can do that TODAY , c'mon guys wake the fuck up

    JP muroJP muro10 dias atrás
    • @JP muro I have shown you multiple videos captured by amateurs, yet you still insist on cgi? What's your proof of CGI?

      alexn310alexn3104 dias atrás
    • @JP muro twitter.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/1377001018102276097 (That was SN11 the twitter pic, the links are SN10) brworld.info/crone/video/q2uE2MmEZqTFe7M.html brworld.info/crone/video/nWmhqLpokK2wgLc.html

      alexn310alexn3104 dias atrás
    • @JP muro Well sure since that was filmed before the launch, lemme find you an amateur video of it. Theres also RGV Aerial Photography, and after the bellyflop Fail of SN11 they photgraphed it's nosecone laying on the ground im gonna get you some links.

      alexn310alexn3104 dias atrás
    • The real question lies beyond you and me and what we both think. Theres proof , that this is all a hoax. The question is why are you defending something that you can't prove, while all claims against what your trying to cling to have tons of facts , scientific, to back them up. My proof is right there , the cgi sequence at the end and the so called landing, i know its hard. We both have our own truths and i respect that, its just that's this is soo in our faces , its impossible not to see. And question its nature

      JP muroJP muro4 dias atrás
    • We'll , yes , i see it. It never took off. Did it? i mean i could go there tomorrow and take a pic, what's your proof? Where's the footage of take off and descent.

      JP muroJP muro4 dias atrás
  • Modern warfare CGI looks way better , should give em a call #elonmusk

    JP muroJP muro10 dias atrás
    • Go to boca chica

      Cleanrial & Tronnzy - RobloxCleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox7 dias atrás
    • looks like a sci fi film

      vbddfy euuytvbddfy euuyt9 dias atrás
  • Alles nur lüge

    Björn der SachseBjörn der Sachse10 dias atrás
    • Jede Person mit einem Donald Trump Profilbild hat still zu sein

      Volksgenosse Erich HoneckerVolksgenosse Erich Honecker9 dias atrás
    • Go there yourself and see it for yourself

      alexn310alexn31010 dias atrás
  • This style of aircraft- is it "Flash Gordon" style? Or more Rocketeer?

    Andy HarrisonAndy Harrison10 dias atrás
  • nice cgi

    shark2vshark2v11 dias atrás
    • Go to boca chica

      Cleanrial & Tronnzy - RobloxCleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox7 dias atrás
    • You can go there yourself and see it

      alexn310alexn31011 dias atrás
  • Is this even real? It looks like cgi

    John McGrathJohn McGrath11 dias atrás
    • yeah, its because it is

      Juan Pablo MuroJuan Pablo Muro4 dias atrás
    • @alexn310 ye

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ10 dias atrás
    • Go to Boca Chica, TX. You can see these getting built and flown in real time there.

      alexn310alexn31011 dias atrás
  • Nice

    Lexi TalksLexi Talks11 dias atrás
  • ไอ้ควายน็อตบอกแผนทุกอย่างองค์กรNASA มีแผนอยากเป็นเบอร์1ของสหรัฐ.แล้วจะกลับไปใช้สถานีอวกาศสกดจิตทุกพรรคในสหรัฐ. ให้สนับสนุนเงินงบประมาณและมีตัวแทนNASA ที่หวังลงชิงต่ำแหน่งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐ.ในสมัยต่อไป

    แก่ง นางแก่ง นาง11 dias atrás
  • NASA กลายเป็นควายเมื่อถูกจับได้ว่าใ้ดาวเทียม และใช้สถานทีอวกาศทดลองมนุษย์ แต่สู้ความคิดมนุษย์ไม่ได้ โดยล่าสุดมีการเปิดเผย ชื่อบอร์ดผู้สั่งให้มนุษย์อวกาศบนสถานีอวกาศทำงานนี้

    แก่ง นางแก่ง นาง11 dias atrás
  • 12:00 I see starhopper

    Dave TimothyDave Timothy11 dias atrás
    • ye love starhopper

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ10 dias atrás
  • What I don’t like about the BFR is that there is no redundancy. Since fuel tanks are located in the nose cone, the crew cannot jettison from the top to escape an inevitable failure. Any manned flights must have redundancy.

    Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries11 dias atrás
    • @Saanichton Ministries I agree ...,.. I don’t see nasa trusting SpaceX to place astronauts on Mars anytime soon until starship has at least 200-600 successful flights without incidence along with a smart AI to pilot starship However SpaceX does have falcon Heavy which is a proven space vehicle which I do see NASA trusting to send to the moon or Mars 🥲 Only the future will tell

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez11 dias atrás
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez fair enough. After a study of the STS program, it would be a nightmare to fly on a rocket. As a pilot myself, it is fascinating science. But way too risky. I don’t ever see the risk factor going away. Man it too flawed. Too much can go wrong in manned space flight. Too many extremes. I don’t know if it is ethical watching people kill themselves trying to go to Mars.... like the Mars one project?

      Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries11 dias atrás
    • @Saanichton Ministries Is this suppose be hyperbole ....? Obviously not, they only flow 4 of them🤦🏻and their still very much prototype rockets That’s the equivalence of me asking you if you’d like a flight on the wrights brothers first plane .....

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez11 dias atrás
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez would you if you could?

      Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries11 dias atrás
    • @Saanichton Ministries 🤨 ....... no I don’t

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez11 dias atrás
  • Демократия не долетит до Марса.

    Денис ПетинДенис Петин12 dias atrás
  • bravo let's Mars but if Mars gravity is lower than Earth it's going to be easy landing

    Pascal FokxPascal Fokx12 dias atrás
    • ouais

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ10 dias atrás
  • FIREBALL XL5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    NOMOLAS GYROTOURBILLONNOMOLAS GYROTOURBILLON12 dias atrás
  • looks like a sci fi film

    vince mmvince mm12 dias atrás
    • ye but is real

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ10 dias atrás
  • That is bull shit.

    Carmen A. CabelloCarmen A. Cabello12 dias atrás
    • @Shorty haha

      It’s grantIt’s grant10 dias atrás
    • Carmen is close to karen

      ShortyShorty10 dias atrás
    • @alexn310 thanks for saving me time

      It’s grantIt’s grant11 dias atrás
    • Go and watch it yourself in boca chica before throwing bullshit accusations on BRworld

      alexn310alexn31012 dias atrás
  • 24 7 live Mars cam coming soon : )

    Nebula DustNebula Dust12 dias atrás
  • Congrats, the best sci fi movie ever... it's incredible...

    collilab laboratorio visivocollilab laboratorio visivo12 dias atrás
  • Большая консервная банка с крыльями и двигателями..круто..поздравляю. Она еще и садиться..супер..

    Константин ГолубятниковКонстантин Голубятников12 dias atrás
  • I like how they cut out where it exploded anyway. Scrub X blew it again. At least they are consistent.

    Jephro321Jephro32112 dias atrás
    • They didn't cut anything out. The livestream ended shortly after landing. The explosion happened approx 7/8 minutes later

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff4 dias atrás
    • Did you even seen the live stream?

      K4!T3NK4!T3N7 dias atrás
    • This is the testing stage it's normal for things to blow up.

      69697 dias atrás
    • @Jephro321 Was saying no to you stating they cut it out. Yes it exploded, but they didnt "cut it out" they ended the stream before it exploded.

      alexn310alexn31011 dias atrás
    • @alexn310 no what it blew up period.

      Jephro321Jephro32112 dias atrás
  • launch pad is too close to the installations ! dangerous

    gilbondfacgilbondfac13 dias atrás
  • When landing, the ignition is too late to correct. It needs to be 1-2 seconds earlier.The liquid fuel bunker should be divided into many small bunkers. Otherwise, if the whole bunker is turned vertically to horizontal, and then to vertical, the kinetic energy of the liquid itself can heat itself, causing expansion and deflagration

    KK FFKK FF13 dias atrás
    • @TimePro oh nvm I commented on this before I check Elon’s Tweet again I kinda didn’t remember the case

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap16 dias atrás
    • @Epic gamer Heap1 Starship DOES use helium. After SN8s crash helium was put into the header tank of SN9 and SN10 to keep the tank pressurized and to prevent what happened to SN8. The helium was not supposed to be ingested.

      TimeProTimePro6 dias atrás
    • @TimePro An Starship does not have helium it only uses lox, methane fuel and pressure.

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap16 dias atrás
    • @Epic gamer Heap1 That would be the case for SN8. SN10 has a hard landing because it ingested helium unexpectedly.

      TimeProTimePro8 dias atrás
    • It is not late according to Elon the single raptor engine was low on thrust to due low pressure inside of one of the tanks

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap18 dias atrás
  • Вероятно, данная труба должна изображать носитель? Труба еле-еле взобралась на высоту 2 км и опустилась на землю. Как она собирается разогнать полезный груз до необходимой скорости? Это просто лапша для неграмотных.

    Dolores IzabellaDolores Izabella13 dias atrás
  • Need to add a parachute placed on top of the missile, when it falls straight. Need to improve the landing cooling system with the missile fixation axle after landing, I mean upgrading the yard system so that under it there is a shaft that can move and attach itself. as a landing gear. Maybe so, try using a flying parachute that cuts off when the Rocket is falling in mid-air. hm ... i think this idea can be sold, maybe n't 😄

    Huỳnh Đức LêHuỳnh Đức Lê14 dias atrás
    • @Huỳnh Đức Lê Please for the love of god stop calling it a missile!

      It’s grantIt’s grant11 dias atrás
    • @Huỳnh Đức Lê Yes, but they've already demonstrated they can land it without, and a parachute would also increase turnaround time for reuse. No need for one if propulsive landing can already yield the requested results.

      alexn310alexn31011 dias atrás
    • @alexn310 I know it's heavy, I mean the parachute is only used for a short time and then cut off when the missile is horizontal, except that the missile is placed at the top of the missile retained at the upright position. The parachute flew horizontally should be two moderate instead of one large enough to bear the load since it would be cut off to enter the final stage anyway. Although mainly used to reduce the force and help more stability, the possibility of wind, the weather will adversely affect the parachute and affect the missile but this problem can be improved. which is that you can use three parachutes to change your posture from horizontal to straight if you cut the parachute from the tail of the Rocket.

      Huỳnh Đức LêHuỳnh Đức Lê12 dias atrás
    • Starship is too heavy for a parachute.

      alexn310alexn31012 dias atrás
  • what do you make of this: Take a look at the spaceX logo. (the actual logo). When I look at the logo SpaceX... I'm seeing: Spy.... then it says..... Cc .....(which in numerology is 33. Freemasons number). .... Then what looks like a symbol that appear to be something trying to 'break out of the dome". So that's one interpretation. Or another: Spa cex. Or in other words "Spa Sex". then the X in that looks like it could represent the act of sex (look carefully, it's crazy.) (boom-chic-a-waa-waa). Okay and a 3rd interpretation goes like this: SpaceX. Well "X" in english and internationally is a way of saying "No". So it's Space-NO. or in reverse: No Space. Which is pretty obvious these days. So those are 3 interpretations of the SpaceX LOGO.

    nice guynice guy14 dias atrás
    • @nice guy I have no patience for people with special needs

      It’s grantIt’s grant6 dias atrás
    • @69 no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

      nice guynice guy6 dias atrás
    • @It’s grant no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

      nice guynice guy6 dias atrás
    • @K4!T3N The rockets are a scam. The cars are turning out to be a scam. Everyone who's used PayPal for any length of time knows it's a complete scam. What has he turned out yet that's actually a quality product that's not a lie or a scam??? The car is one thing, because it's just a really really shitty car. But the rockets are total frauds. It's not space exploration. It's a fireworks company. People are so dumb they don't understand anything.

      nice guynice guy6 dias atrás
    • You milking it??.... bruuuuuuhhhh

      K4!T3NK4!T3N7 dias atrás
  • I think that the engineers made a mistake in constructing the "SN" rocket in that they practically limited the cooling of the "Raptor" engine. When the descent starts and the engines start, they start or do not work. Then air pressure is created which returns the heat to the "pot", so to speak. With Falcon rockets, the engines are free and they don't have that problem. One of the solutions is to drill holes in the lower part, next to the legs, or to line the engines with refractory material.

    Biljana Milinčić-BežanovićBiljana Milinčić-Bežanović14 dias atrás
  • Did anybody see the paper clip to the right of screen

    hordes Coffeehordes Coffee14 dias atrás
    • ?????????? please show when?????????? U OK DUDE????????????

      It’s grantIt’s grant11 dias atrás
  • Well done folks . Keep it up .

    Die KatzeDie Katze14 dias atrás
  • cgi did not improve much i guess..

    derms terderms ter14 dias atrás
    • @K4!T3N you speak like you came from there lol

      derms terderms ter7 dias atrás
    • @derms ter Go to boca chica, texas.... you're just lazy... lol

      K4!T3NK4!T3N7 dias atrás
    • @derms ter Theirs no need...... theirs hundreds of videos of the landing .......

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez11 dias atrás
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez you film the landing for me, i will believe

      derms terderms ter11 dias atrás
    • @derms ter Go to boca chica in the next 2-3 weeks for SN15..........Lets see if its CGI at that point :)

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez11 dias atrás
  • team.

    bouytt guytbouytt guyt14 dias atrás
  • Оооо ес 🤑

    FinZdravFinZdrav14 dias atrás
  • Cool

    nothing is impossiblenothing is impossible14 dias atrás
    • brworld.info/crone/video/ioqutbZmrqeypas.html

      Aistis AukstikalnisAistis Aukstikalnis13 dias atrás
  • The mature pan practically observe because custard adventitiously refuse apud a unadvised captain. handy, dull black

    Ca SneaksCa Sneaks14 dias atrás
  • Eh 3 years left before the starship goes to Mars

    Jared Johanne AgustinJared Johanne Agustin14 dias atrás
    • Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se s

      bouytt guytbouytt guyt14 dias atrás
  • That.... was incredible!

    Ron GuadaRon Guada14 dias atrás
  • soooooo perfect

    NOOBSTORENOOBSTORE15 dias atrás
  • Release the onboard camera during descent so that we can see space at that altitude. Oh nevermind, it's still the decades long grammar why not

    dLedger XYZdLedger XYZ15 dias atrás
    • This flight went to 10km. If you want to 'see space at that altitude', whatever that means, you'd be better served by booking a flight on an airliner, as they can get up to 13km.

      Brent SmithBrent Smith8 dias atrás
  • more tax payers money down the Shitter

    Carl'os the JackalCarl'os the Jackal15 dias atrás
    • Your probably more dependent on the government tax payers than SpaceX is.........Their a private space company :)

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez11 dias atrás
    • It's a private company, no tax payers money

      Ethan RobertsEthan Roberts15 dias atrás
  • The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

    ceerw butyceerw buty15 dias atrás
  • You are coming from the SN11 flight test yesterday. 😂

    Charalampos AvgenikosCharalampos Avgenikos15 dias atrás
    • Yes 😭😭

      ForgeSkyGamingForgeSkyGaming14 dias atrás
  • Это что то фантастическое

    Максим ПоскинМаксим Поскин15 dias atrás
  • The typical profit quantitatively scold because height formally mix notwithstanding a steadfast room. squeamish, incandescent net

    Peter ZhuPeter Zhu15 dias atrás
  • the geniuses just keep showing off.. very impressive

    Daniel PerezDaniel Perez16 dias atrás
    • Give it a few more minutes

      ceerw butyceerw buty15 dias atrás
  • Congratulations 🎉👍

    HYTECH REALATORSHYTECH REALATORS16 dias atrás
  • The brash destruction joly add because tuna tellingly complain notwithstanding a helpful smile. quizzical, bright nation

    one clickone click16 dias atrás
  • The dramatic club relevantly kiss because otter broadly scorch per a selfish aluminium. square, impolite temple

    Mayo GarlandMayo Garland16 dias atrás
  • pero tambien da la impresión que fue un lanzamiento controlado preparando algo a si como para un futuro aterrizaje esa son mis tres impresiones no se elucubro

    Manuel MartinManuel Martin16 dias atrás
  • Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se si existe tecnología para enfocar a tan larga distancia esta toma me hace recordar un programa de Tv de cuando era niño .( Thunderbirds Los Guardianes del Espacio ) que por cierto todo lo que allí emitían hoy día es una realidad ........................suspicacia

    Manuel MartinManuel Martin16 dias atrás
  • Рогозин обосрался...

    Андрій ВолодимировичАндрій Володимирович16 dias atrás
  • Who’s here after SN11 blew up mid-flip maneuver

    Jay PaintJay Paint16 dias atrás
    • @Jay Paint That's better!

      XZenoRaptorXZenoRaptor7 dias atrás
    • @XZenoRaptor Yeah that sounds a bit pessimistic. Let me fix that.

      Jay PaintJay Paint7 dias atrás
    • mid-landing flip you mean

      Pol VallsPol Valls15 dias atrás
    • It didn't blow up mid-flight...

      XZenoRaptorXZenoRaptor15 dias atrás
  • Elon: NUCLEAR MISSILE COMIN' YOUR WAY!... Just kidding...

    ᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱ16 dias atrás
    • a missile coming belly first?

      Pol VallsPol Valls15 dias atrás
  • ...SpaceXtastic...!!!

    Ian MortonIan Morton16 dias atrás
  • Shouldn't have launched sn11 in the fog, it was gonna blow up anyway even if the FTS didn't work. Welp sn15 here we come

    asterisKsasterisKs16 dias atrás
    • Wether there was fog or not it doesn’t change anything.

      TimeProTimePro11 dias atrás
    • That's what I said! And everyone went mental at me for calling SpaceX foolish as fuck for doing so. Completely rushed and wasted.

      Darth RevanDarth Revan12 dias atrás
  • great achievement, the landing is awesome, but somehow i don't like those type of spaceships. I believe one day we will go into one piece of fully controlled spaceship :)

    DonDon16 dias atrás
    • @Matt's BRworld stuff rather 500-1000y ;)

      DonDon3 dias atrás
    • @Don Yes it's very interesting indeed. Perhaps we will see such technological advancements 50-100 years from now.

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff4 dias atrás
    • @Matt's BRworld stuff to travel to new stars also requires very high medical knowledge, Hybernation. if it will turn out no teleporation is possible (again quantum entanglement story) That quantum ental..... is imo one of the most important thing in whole science. Why it exists, what is that for? to carry mental state from dead body ? living after death in different dimention? We can't see any real connection of paired subparticules on distance, but maybe this is the effect of some processes from highe dimension. As scientist can't detect any even smallest fluctuation of anything during the process ,when changing state of 1st particular automatically change state of the other in time of ZERO at whatever distance. If I remember the latest test was performed at the distance of around 60kms or more. Although near death experience (NDE) happens only in our heads.... we cannot just say for 100% that it's due to processes in brain (very likely) but if we hear that those people could be in all places they want at the same time, that they even could tell what their family members (away) were doing while they were "out" of their bodies as they claim. Of course assuming that at least a few stories were real not just faked for any reason...as people can do a lot for money. ....selling stories etc. The most interesting is the case of neurosurgeon (not religiious one). What the nature uses that feature for. This is the most interesting thing for me in whole science...

      DonDon4 dias atrás
    • @Don You are right, of course, we don't know the technological advancements that will occur well into the future. The sort of technology that helps engineer an SSTO vehicle will likely be used to travel to new stars.

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff4 dias atrás
    • @Matt's BRworld stuff nowadays impossible. Imagine getting energy from splitting atom ( a lot in atmosphere) on fly and later in space getting it from photons or other stuff, included magainzed energy from new kind of battery. Too early to even imagine how it may be in next 1000years. I bet the aim is not to carry too much fuel with the ship and that might be possible as you can get energy from anything.. what matters is to create proper devices which can do that. Also imagine that something might be hidden.. explain how works quantum entalngement... maybe we will be able to send small portions of energy if a source is millions kms away. If we can affect a state of an sub-atom particular on distance, that means a change. a change means that something happens if something happens you can get energy from that...as there is no action without energy. to change something = energy rises... so why not to connect millions of the particles to set entanglement on on those packets and do something with that on distance ;) In space you only needs energy to change velocity and direction of you vehicle... landing or starting from planets different storry as you have a lot of particules in atmospheres you can use to get that energy

      DonDon4 dias atrás
  • Yep, I knew it

    Syahrul RidzuanSyahrul Ridzuan16 dias atrás
  • High altitude ? ??? It's a rocket , ten kilometers ( six miles ) is not high . Germany was sending rockets that high in 1944 . 76 years and no progress ??? . And this is an empty rocket , load her up with fuel and life support systems and this tin can will never leave the launch pad . MARS has nothing to fear

    Neil McmacNeil Mcmac16 dias atrás
    • @Neil Mcmac so you're stuck in the past considering you said you lived through the 60s and 70s. You're hated for Elon Musk also seems to be getting in the way of your good judgment if you ever had any. Starship and Saturn v are not comparable. We did not have real reusable rockets in the 40s quit making up shit.

      69697 dias atrás
    • @Pol Valls dollars to doughnuts says Musk picks up and leaves town before any of his make believe rockets ever reach orbit . He is just suckling as many dollars out of the system that he can , or are you one of those morons that really believe Musk is using his own money . Lay off the drugs and try to think ahead a little , you load that tin can up with supplies, life support, crew quarters and extra engines and fuel to orbit and de-orbit and you have a disaster waiting to happen . Nothing but a pipe dream .

      Neil McmacNeil Mcmac9 dias atrás
    • @Neil Mcmac falcon 9 landed at its 5th try and now it's the most reliable rocket. Starship had 4, and next prototype is full of new technologies successfully proven. Please, don't compare a mission to a test. The expectations are different, Saturn V was pioneering, Starship is so too. And Sn10 landed. SN11 tested advanced solutions, they learn from them and they will do the same, fly fail fix

      Pol VallsPol Valls9 dias atrás
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez yeah it wasnt a good paragraph but you get the point that im trying to make. again, you said it very well

      IsaQuestIsaQuest10 dias atrás
    • @IsaQuest because you don't learn anything if the damn thing is not balanced as it would be , or loaded as it would be . Musk is going ass backwards . Proving something that doesn't help him one little bit in the real world . Put weights in to make up for crew, fuel, live support . Now test it , Musk is testing on an empty can , the balance point will not be close to what a real ships balance would be ,,,,, so at the end of the day Musk has learned zero .

      Neil McmacNeil Mcmac10 dias atrás
  • Give it a few more minutes

    haug0099haug009916 dias atrás
  • whos here after sn11

    ToXiC_BigFatBabyToXiC_BigFatBaby16 dias atrás
  • 🚀My rating: Starship SN8: 8/10 Starship SN9: 4/10 Starship SN10: 9/10 Starship SN11: 2/10 Gonna update my rating every time from now on.

    Latortuga 007Latortuga 00716 dias atrás
    • What is your rating based on? Level of excitement or what was achieved? I'm just curious as to how you gave SN11 a 2/10, you couldn't see a damn thing! lol I would argue that SN11 is an unfortunate 0/10 because of the fog, but from an engineering perspective a 10/10 because it helped them identify an issue that they need to fix for future missions.

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff4 dias atrás
    • @IsaQuest no.

      Pol VallsPol Valls15 dias atrás
    • @TimePro the leaning was cool too

      Latortuga 007Latortuga 00715 dias atrás
    • SN9 I'd say would be also 9/10. They fixed the header tank issue that was present in SN8s flight.

      TimeProTimePro15 dias atrás
    • @Starship SN10 ur welcome! ☺️

      Latortuga 007Latortuga 00715 dias atrás
  • Nutso!!lol...beautiful but nuts!!!congratulations to the whole team!!

    Armchair RevolutionaryArmchair Revolutionary16 dias atrás
BRworld